Trend Resource nationalism rises while major economies race to stabilise critical mineral supply chains
Summary
Resource-holding countries are designating critical minerals as strategic minerals and tightening control over them. Their tools include nationalisation, limits on resource development and export controls, which KISTEP describes as resource nationalism or weaponisation. In response, the United States, the EU and Japan are pursuing supply-chain stabilisation and diversification. Their measures span resource development, stockpiling and the promotion of recycling industries. The report presents this contest as a structural shift that raises the strategic value of mineral technology and supply planning.
Classification
Main topicTrade & Economic Security
Region menusGlobal
Impactscope:global
Time horizon4-10 years (2026-09-30)
Published2026-01
Last updated2026-10-01 17:42 KST
Evidence 1
- 한국과학기술기획평가원(KISTEP) 전략기획센터 KISTEP Think 2026, 9대 과학기술혁신 아젠다 한국과학기술기획평가원(KISTEP) 전략기획센터 no link — bibliographic entry p. 12 2026-01 accessed 2026-09-30
Observed signals 6
- SignalChina's gallium and germanium export controls and Indonesia's nickel ore export ban
- SignalCritical mineral demand grew strongly in 2024 as clean and advanced technologies spread
- SignalDOE launches $100M PROSPECT workforce initiative as EXIM announces $58M in critical mineral loans
- SignalFirst Korea-Central Asia Summit opens in Seoul, to adopt Seoul Declaration
- SignalKorea and Chile agree to modernize FTA, restart joint trade committee after decade
- SignalSouth Korea, Argentina Sign Critical Minerals MOU Covering Full Lithium Value Chain
Part of issues 1
- IssueAgenda 4: Strengthening full-cycle R&D innovation to secure rare minerals2 trends · 1 signals
Relation types: constitutes · supports
Public id: fm-e12cd184d1ba
