Issue Choosing the interaction type is a design decision, not a default
Summary
Deloitte argues that choosing how workers relate to AI is an important design decision that organisations often overlook. It sets out a range of interaction types ordered by how much authority the AI holds. At the high end, AI can act as a boss that sets priorities and monitors work, or as a coach that offers feedback and guidance. In the middle sit AI as a creative collaborator, an assistant that makes recommendations or a direct report whose outputs people review. At the low end, AI can mimic a person's behaviour as a digital double or work autonomously on low-value tasks. Each type calls for different formal rules and cultural conditions, so firms should involve workers and match the type to the work and the people.
Classification
Evidence 2
- 2026 Global Human Capital Trends: From tensions to tipping points - Choosing the human advantage Deloitte Insights (Deloitte Development LLC) page=14;section=Getting human and machine relationships right / Design at the micro level 2026-01 accessed 2026-07-26
- 2026 Global Human Capital Trends: From tensions to tipping points - Choosing the human advantage Deloitte Insights (Deloitte Development LLC) page=14;section=Getting human and machine relationships right / Figure 4 2026-01 accessed 2026-07-26
Constituent trends 1
Directly linked signals 0
No objects.
Relation types: constitutes
Public id: fm-7cc806d07f09
