Issue Productivity restated as accuracy times relevance times impact over cognitive input
Summary
This issue proposes a new way of defining productivity for an era of AI assistants and agents. Traditionally, success was judged by output per hour, such as the number of briefs drafted or accounts audited, on the assumption that time produced results. EY argues that with AI, time is no longer scarce and that the binding limits are now human insight and accuracy. Productivity should therefore reflect the quality and effect of results compared with how much human supervision they need. EY offers a formula in which accuracy, relevance and impact are multiplied together and divided by human cognitive input. The less correction a valuable result requires, the more productive the work, which points toward measuring how well people and intelligent systems perform together.
Classification
Evidence 1
- Futures Reimagined: EY Megatrends 2026 and beyond EY (Ernst & Young Global Limited) page=23;section=Megatrend 3: The productivity reset 2026 accessed 2026-07-25
Constituent trends 1
- TrendThe productivity reset5 signals
Directly linked signals 0
No objects.
Relation types: constitutes
Public id: fm-faf0574bba48
