Issue Policy area 1: international relations must absorb new actors, new arenas and new entities
Summary
This issue gathers the report's cross-cutting implications for international relations. Governments may be expected to play a more active role in protecting national interests from large technology companies able to shape geopolitical conflicts. Multilateral institutions may seek extra support to build new mechanisms for regulating how technology is developed and deployed. Unregulated competition over new technologies, resources and arenas could worsen international tensions and damage the environment. Global governance structures may go through a period of upheaval as they try to integrate tech firms, metaverses, network states and digital nations. Together these point to an international order that must absorb new actors, spaces and entities.
Classification
Evidence 4
- Exploring Change in Geotechnomics Policy Horizons Canada page=16;section=Cross-cutting policy implications / International relations 2025 accessed 2026-07-26
- Exploring Change in Geotechnomics Policy Horizons Canada page=16;section=Cross-cutting policy implications / International relations 2025 accessed 2026-07-26
- Exploring Change in Geotechnomics Policy Horizons Canada page=16;section=Cross-cutting policy implications / International relations 2025 accessed 2026-07-26
- Exploring Change in Geotechnomics Policy Horizons Canada page=15;section=Cross-cutting policy implications / International relations 2025 accessed 2026-07-26
Constituent trends 4
- TrendGeotechnomics: geopolitics, technology and economics converge into one change dynamic4 signals
- TrendStory 1: technology companies and their owners contest the primacy of states4 signals
- TrendStory 3: smaller states holding strategic resources gain outsized influence7 signals
- TrendStory 6: network states, digital nations and global citizenship contest statehood4 signals
Directly linked signals 2
Relation types: constitutes · direct_urgent
Public id: fm-a18761d1fb1b
