Trend Deglobalization turns energy-transition materials into geopolitical bottlenecks
Summary
For decades the world economy divided labor by comparative advantage, and energy was no exception, with oil from the Middle East, gas from Russia and solar panels from China. The author argues that growing dependence on particular countries and firms came to be seen as a security threat, not merely an economic weakness. The 2018 US-China trade war showed technology and supply chains becoming the core arena of strategic competition, and the 2020 pandemic exposed the fragility of global divisions of labor. China's dual circulation strategy and the US CHIPS Act and Inflation Reduction Act are cited as institutional expressions of a shift from efficiency to security. The fallout now reaches beyond fossil fuels to lithium, cobalt, rare-earth magnets, semiconductors, transformers and cables, whose production and processing are extremely concentrated. Countries turning to renewables to cut fossil-fuel imports thus risk a new dependence on specific countries for components and materials.
Classification
Evidence 1
- 과학기술정책연구원(STEPI) Future Horizon+ 2026 제1·2호 — 특집: 생존을 위한 길: 미래전략 수립과 중장기 미래 비전 과학기술정책연구원(STEPI) no link — bibliographic entry p. 10 2026-06-02 accessed 2026-09-30
Observed signals 2
Part of issues 2
- IssueKorea needs supply-chain and alliance diversification plus foresight capacity2 trends · 1 signals
- IssueSecuring and substituting critical materials as an energy-security technology task2 trends · 1 signals
Relation types: constitutes · supports
Public id: fm-d1a77b0fdb62
