Trend US-China rivalry hardens into a prolonged structural clash of national strategies
Summary
The report reads the conflict as a collision between the America First drive to realise MAGA under Trump's second term and Xi Jinping's pursuit of the China Dream through Chinese-style modernisation. Because both goals are long-range national strategies, it judges that the dispute will persist rather than fade. Disputes over economic systems, trade imbalances, intellectual property and competing visions of the world economic order are described as a structural clash rather than a passing trade quarrel. Citing Baldwin and other analysts, the authors argue that a system clash between market-led and state-led capitalism cannot be won outright, so deadlock is more likely than a grand bargain. Korea is urged to treat this as a new normal and prepare for a long contest in which the world order itself is being reshaped.
Classification
Evidence 1
- 대외경제정책연구원(KIEP) 미·중 전략경쟁 쟁점별 한국의 입장과 전략방향 연구 대외경제정책연구원(KIEP) no link — bibliographic entry pp. 5, 6, 571 2026-02 accessed 2026-09-30
Observed signals 4
- SignalAFTP report finds China missed Phase One commitments as the bilateral deficit widened
- SignalChina's 2025 white papers draw red lines and frame the conflict as a set of wars
- SignalSurvey of 264 Korean experts expects a prolonged rivalry and less dependence on both powers
- SignalUS strategy documents designate China a strategic adversary and geopolitical rival
Part of issues 4
- IssueFrom security with the US and economy with China to security with the US and economy with the world1 trends · 1 signals
- IssueScenario: repeated small deals rather than a US-China grand bargain1 trends · 1 signals
- IssueStrengthening Korea's strategic flexibility and leverage with both powers1 trends · 0 signals
- IssueTariffs as the most negotiable issue in US-China bargaining1 trends · 1 signals
Relation types: constitutes · supports
Public id: fm-6a336e28dd52
